<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Camacho Connecticut Monarca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/</link>
	<description>Nothing beats a nice tight ash!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 03:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: get back links</title>
		<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>get back links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 04:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicetightash.com/?p=1546#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>I love your wp design, exactly where do you obtain it from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your wp design, exactly where do you obtain it from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/comment-page-1/#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicetightash.com/?p=1546#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Smoking this right now, and I have to say that I really like the little extra kick it has for a mild connecticut. The draw is a little loose, but from what my local B&amp;M owner tells me, this is normal for Camacho. Your comment &quot;not my favorite connecticut&quot; made me think....it might me an interesting subsection of the site to see what all of the reviewers favorites are in the different classes of cigars. Something to think about, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smoking this right now, and I have to say that I really like the little extra kick it has for a mild connecticut. The draw is a little loose, but from what my local B&amp;M owner tells me, this is normal for Camacho. Your comment &#8220;not my favorite connecticut&#8221; made me think&#8230;.it might me an interesting subsection of the site to see what all of the reviewers favorites are in the different classes of cigars. Something to think about, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labman (Charlie)</title>
		<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Labman (Charlie)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicetightash.com/?p=1546#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Nice review! I&#039;m not usually a fan of Connecticut cigars, but I&#039;ve heard a lot of good things about these Camacho Connecticut&#039;s. It&#039;s that touch of spice and medium-body that really intrigues me...I&#039;m going to have to give these a go! Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review! I&#8217;m not usually a fan of Connecticut cigars, but I&#8217;ve heard a lot of good things about these Camacho Connecticut&#8217;s. It&#8217;s that touch of spice and medium-body that really intrigues me&#8230;I&#8217;m going to have to give these a go! Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Camacho Connecticut Video Review @ NiceTightAsh.com &#124; Camacho Cigars</title>
		<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Camacho Connecticut Video Review @ NiceTightAsh.com &#124; Camacho Cigars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicetightash.com/?p=1546#comment-968</guid>
		<description>[...] more reviews like this one, please visit: NiceTightAsh.com Twitter This   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more reviews like this one, please visit: NiceTightAsh.com Twitter This   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CWS</title>
		<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/comment-page-1/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>CWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicetightash.com/?p=1546#comment-967</guid>
		<description>Very consistent in terms of taste - went great with some coffee in the morning. 
I wasn&#039;t overwhelmed, but I wasn&#039;t looking to be overwhelmed either. Overall I think it&#039;s a good, solid cigar*


*Taste is always subjective</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very consistent in terms of taste &#8211; went great with some coffee in the morning.<br />
I wasn&#8217;t overwhelmed, but I wasn&#8217;t looking to be overwhelmed either. Overall I think it&#8217;s a good, solid cigar*</p>
<p>*Taste is always subjective</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike - KnightRid</title>
		<link>http://nicetightash.com/camacho-connecticut-monarca/comment-page-1/#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike - KnightRid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicetightash.com/?p=1546#comment-966</guid>
		<description>I had a few of these before (thanx Jerry) and i thought they were decent, but not my favorite Connie either ;)

It wasnt BAD, just maybe threw me off due to the stronger style of it?

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a few of these before (thanx Jerry) and i thought they were decent, but not my favorite Connie either ;)</p>
<p>It wasnt BAD, just maybe threw me off due to the stronger style of it?</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

